Some Thoughts on Hormonal Contraceptives

The issue of birth control came to the foreground for me when I was diagnosed with Polycystic Ovarian Syndrome. Basically my ovaries were maturing oocytes but often were unable to release these eggs, resulting in cysts. In response to the first grouping of ova sacks not rupturing my body would mature subsequent groupings that were unsuccessful, utilizing more of the unregenerative number of immature gametes. Following this revelation my prior doctor gave me a limited time to have children and informed me that I would have to rely on fertility medications and possible artificial interventions like IVF and ICSI. That doctor's advisement was to begin taking an oral hormonal contraceptive for 3 months followed by a cycle of Clomid, an ovulation inducing medication.

That doctor's suggestion became an immediate subject with our Priest, who graciously made it known that even though it is an abortifacient there would not be any moral dilemma with using the contraceptives as long as we were abstaining during the interval I was taking the medication. Abstinence would be a necessary precaution do to the contraceptive's abortive properties. If we were not to abstain while I was ingesting the medication and a child was conceived, the baby would not be received in to the naturally hospitable environment of the uterus, but rather into a hostile, chemically transformed habitat incapable of fostering implantation.

Our priest also warned us that he did not think abstaining for that duration would be conducive to the beginning of a healthy marriage. Even the abstinence required for accurate Natural Family Planning practices is only a few days a month. After the discussion with our Priest I switched from my pro-life doctor to a Catholic ob/gyn and midwife that were family centered, NFP oriented, and did not provide contraception. We felt very strongly that the professionals that would be aiding our family needed to be in complete conformity with church teachings.

For most gynecologists and obstetricians their first course of action for fertility concerns is to prescribe the regiment of hormonal birth control for 3 months to restart the reproductive system, essentially by stopping its function, and follow that time period with a prescription for an ovulation inducing medication like Clomid. This instant response is a result of connections with major pharmaceutical companies and not the need of the misinformed patients who are unaware of there options. Often times, on the occasion that the ovulation inducer does provoke ovulation, a large number of oocytes are expelled producing multiple babies, therefore greater health risks for all parties involved.

In addition to putting yourself and children in danger, there are all the side effects from the contraceptives themselves. These adverse effects, include increased heart disease, breast and ovarian cancer ovarian cysts, and uterine fibroids, are why we will not be using the recommended hormone regiment and now use a Catholic obstetrician/gynecologists and midwife. On a side note, the use of hormonal contraceptives as an aid for PMS or to regulate cycles still hold the same long term side effects. And further women are given this endowment of pain each month as an opportunity for penance as with child birth. Clomid has side effects of its own, like hot flashes and ovarian hyperstimulation. Another draw back to using Clomid is that the drug inhibits the production of the viable cervical mucus crucial to the survival of sperm within the female reproductive tract. A possible solution to this side effect may be the use of Preseed, the only nonspermicidal personal moisturizer, with a make up similar to that of fertile cervical mucus. There are also many natural and licit measures for PMS, cycle regulation, and conception assistance through the help of the Creighton Method and Dr. Hildgers at the Pope Paul VI Institute.

I have been charting for fertility awareness for a few years now, and that was also the counsel given by my ob/gyn and midwife, to determine when ovulation occurs and at what frequency. It may take longer for us to conceive than those using artificial conception methods but most importantly we will not unknowingly be killing our children, moreover it will serve as a reminder to us that a child is not a right, but in fact gift that deserves to be conceived, as Pope John Paul II expressed, though a natural and marital act of love.

Just One More Reason to Homeschool.

Maryland Judge Rules Against Parents on Homosexual Curriculum

LifeSiteNews
February 8, 2008

"Judge Rowan's ruling gives a green light to homosexual groups throughout Maryland to pressure school boards to adopt similar policies." Richard Thompson,Thomas More Law Center

ANN ARBOR, MI (LifeSiteNews) - Maryland Circuit Court Judge William J. Rowan, III, ruled last week that it is permissible to teach 8th and 10th grade Montgomery County public school students how to use condoms during anal and oral sex, as well as that homosexuality is inborn, even though in 2007 Maryland's highest appellate court ruled there is no scientific basis for such a conclusion. The controversial new curriculum was adopted as a result of pressure by homosexual advocacy groups.

That sexual orientation is innate is a theory that has been rejected by courts in several states including Maryland. Maryland's highest appellate court issued an opinion in a 2007 civil union case, holding that the proposition that homosexuality is innate is not supported by credible evidence. In fact, not one U.S. court presented with the issue has found homosexuality to be an innate characteristic.

The Thomas More Law Center, a national public interest law firm based in Ann Arbor, Michigan, which represents Citizens for a Responsible Curriculum, the Family Leader Network, and the Parents and Friends of Ex-Gays had asked the Judge Rowan to overturn a Maryland Board of Education ruling that approves of public schools in Montgomery County, Maryland to teaching 8th and 10th graders that homosexuals are born that way, and how to use condoms during anal and oral sex.

274 Montgomery area doctors signed a petition objecting to the curriculum which promotes the notion that the use of condoms prevents disease in anal intercourse.

Richard Thompson, President and Chief Counsel of the Thomas More Law Center commented, "Judge Rowan's ruling gives a green light to homosexual groups throughout Maryland to pressure school boards to adopt similar policies. We will be meeting with our clients next week regarding an appeal. "

Montgomery educators defended their new sex curriculum that promotes anal sex, homosexuality, bisexuality and transvestitism despite strong opposition from several pro family groups.

Brandon Bolling, the Thomas More Law Center attorney who argued the case, asked Judge Rowan to either declare the curriculum illegal or send it back to the state board of education for another review. "Maryland law says that you have to teach something that is factually accurate," said Bolling. "They are not doing that, therefore it is illegal. "

Magnificat Breakfast

The Catholic Women's Ministry, Magnificat will be hosting a ladies breakfast Saturday February 16th from 9-12pm. It will be held at the DFW Hilton in Grapevine, Texas with Mary Ann Kuharski, Director of PROLIFE Across America and author of Raising Catholic Children and Outnumbered, Raising 13 Kids with Humor and Prayer as the guest speaker. In addition to being a well respected author and her work with PROLIFE Across America, Mary Ann Kuharski is a stay-at-home mother to 13 and advocate for adoption.

Tickets for the breakfast are $18 and can be acquired through Nancy Ferri at 817-498-7980. February 12th is the purchase deadline. The Breakfast will also include sections of praise and Eucharistic devotion followed by opportunities for confession. More information on PROLIFE Across America can be found at their website: www.prolifeacrossamerica.org

Some Thoughts on Pregnancy and Birth

The following is a post I found from my good friend Liz. She is a catholic mother of 4 and a strong advocate for natural home birth, attachment parenting, co-sleeping, breastfeeding, and homeschooling. I have always planned on raising my children in the same way and when I read her post I knew it needed to be shared. Hopefully after those who read this will be careful not to waist the perfect opportunity for penance that God intended through natural birth.


As a pregnant woman, I find I have little in common with certain other pregnant women. When I was pregnant with our oldest it was the fact that most of the other first time moms were a good ten years older than me. They were over thirty, had "lived" life and felt they were ready for parenthood.

I have always felt that the morons of the world are the ones who think they're ready. Guess what, you're never ready.

When I was prego with number two son, it was the other moms who were on their second child who would ask if I was going to have any more after that because God knows, that was it for them.

Now I find I'm just impatient with the pregnant women choose to be ignorant. The ones who I run into all the time who don't read anything have no idea what's going on with their bodies or their babies. It's enough to make me scream. I'm talking about usually college educated women who have careers. They're smart, they just choose to be ignorant when it comes to bringing their child into the world. And it's usually the ones who won't eat any kind of fish or avoid having even half a glass of wine during their whole pregnancy. They're very careful not to put anything into their bodies that could hurt the baby but when it comes time for the baby to come out they want to be pumped full of drugs and "delivered".

I'm not even saying you shouldn't ever have pain medication but don't you want to know what your options are? Don't you want to know what your body does during labor and delivery? What you can expect to happen, or what you have the right to refuse be done to you.

The attitude of being afraid to question a Doctor's decision regarding your care because you are afraid of offending him or because you think he's doing you some big favor by delivering your child is just silly. He's offering you a service, he's being compensated for that service. Yes you have a say in what happens, if you don't tell him/her what you prefer, then they'll do what is easiest for them. Why not, I would too. If you don't care how the job gets done, then I'll do what is easiest and most convenient for me.

You might not believe me that Doctors do what is most convenient for them or make a lot of decisions from a risk management position. You might say this is the United States, we have the technology we are the greatest country in the world. The safest place you could be to have a baby is in an American hospital with an American Doctor.

I would then tell you that you were crazy. If you did the slightest bit of homework you'd find that the great U S of A is number 34 on the infant mortality rate list. Yes, I'll say it again number 34. That means that there are 33 countries safer to have a baby in than America. Ok, there are some pretty tiny countries ahead of us but even if you knock off 5 or 10 countries from the list we would still be around number 24.

If you don't like what I've said so far, then you are going to hate it when I tell you that many of the countries that have a lower infant death mortality rate have a much higher instance of births attended by midwives. It makes sense though. If you ask anyone who has experienced both, a hospital birth attended by a physician or a birth attended by a midwife, you will find they will tell you the difference in care is remarkable.

I'll tell you a few of the reasons why. When you are in a hospital setting, you are surrounded by technology and they have all the equipment necessary for any situation that may arise, but they also set themselves up to need this technology by intervening in what is a natural process. For reasons like Doctor convenience and the need for them to speed things up so you'll stay on their schedule, they do all kinds of interventive procedures which necessitate the need for technology so they can know when their interventions are not working or are putting the mother and baby at risk.

During the normal hospital delivery, you don't see your doctor very often. He/She pops in for a minute or two during labor and then leaves you in the care of the nurses, who rely on the machines they have you (so conveniently for them) hooked up to to tell them when things are going south. So, yes you do need all that technology in that setting because by the time they catch something, the need to fix the problem is immediate. Contrast that to a natural birth with a midwife who is with you the whole time assessing the situation and is much more able to catch potential problems earlier on and address them or asses the need for medical intervention. It's just a completely different attitude about the birthing process.

The midwife approach views birth as a natural process which they assist and help with in case of problems. The obstetrical approach is more of a cure you of the sickness of pregnancy. That's why you go to a hospital right? Your sick and they make you better.

You wonder why it would be this way, why won't the Doctors take a different approach ? I'll tell you why, because no one requires it of them. Because they have tons of patients who take more time picking the right car seat to coordinate with their diaper bag than they do picking or questioning their Doctor.

I'll leave you with this:

"In the U.S. the national infant mortality rate was 8.9 deaths per 1,000 live births [in 1991]. The worst state was Delaware at 11.8, with the District of Columbia even worse at 21.0. The best state was Vermont, with only 5.8. Vermont also has one of the highest rates of home birth in the country as well as a larger portion of midwife-attended births than most states. . .

"The international standing of the U.S. [in terms of infant mortality rates] did not really begin to fall until the mid-1950s. This correlates perfectly with the founding of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologist (ACOG) in 1951. ACOG is a trade union representing the financial and professional interests of obstetricians who has sought to secure a monopoly in pregnancy and childbirth services. Prior to ACOG, the U.S. always ranked in 10th place or better. Since the mid-1950s the U.S. has consistently ranked below 12th place and hasn't been above 16th place since 1975. The relative standing of the U.S. continues to decline even to the present."

("International Infant Mortality Rates--U.S. in 22nd Place," David Stewart, NAPSAC News, Fall-Winter, 1993, pages 36, 38.)

Since Liz wrote this in 2003 the United States has dropped 3 places to 37 in infant mortality rate.

It is Truly a Miracle!

Before I begin the update on my Father's amazing recovery, first let me apologize for the extended silence. With all the trauma after Thanksgiving on top of trying to finishing up the semester with finals, and then the holidays, I found no time to sit down and blog. That being said, and with the spring semester in commencement preparation I have returned.

When I posted initially concerning my Father, we nor the doctors knew much about what was happening. My Father had not been feeling well the night of Nov. 24 and began exhibiting symptoms of hypoglycemia. To combat this episode of low blood sugar my Mother brought him a root beer and then left the room to get a peppermint. The first part of this miracle was that my Mother was there to help him, the doctors said repeatedly that if he had been alone he would have died. When my Mother returned with the peppermint my Father was sweating profusely and was unable to breath, this was when my Mother call the ambulance and shortly afterwards my Father lost consciousness. After arriving at the emergency room the EMTs told my Mother that my Father had stopped breathing and had no heartbeat in the ambulance and that they had been doing CPR for over 9 minutes. When he got to the hospital the doctors gave my Father all the different types of blood thinners that the hospital had because they suspected a stroke or heart attack, as well as, intubated and placed my Father on a respirator as he was unable to breathe on his own. The next week was very uncertain and frightening because the doctors performed numerous tests but were not really finding anything in order to make a diagnosis. By the end of the week they ruled out a stroke and assumed he had a heart hypoglycemia induced heart attack, the did not however find a clot most likely due to all the blood thinners he was given upon arrival at the hospital. At the end of the week the doctors were able to remove the respirator and feeding tube and my Father was successful at breathing on his own. Although unable to speak because of the tubes that were removed, my Father did recognize everyone that came in to see him and could comprehend what was being said. This is another miracle because brain damage occurs after 4 minutes without oxygen and my Father was without oxygen for over 9 minutes. The next week my Father went home and did not go back to work until the first of the year. He is a very hard worker and good provider for the family, this was the longest vacation he ever had, and the first Christmas he did not have to work on the 26th of December.

I can not thank everyone enough for all the prayers, I know that without them my Father would not be here. All the Praise and Glory be to God the Mighty Healer!